<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEO Blog &#187; General</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seous.com/blog/category/general/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seous.com/blog</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:04:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Untargeted Traffic is Waste of Bandwith</title>
		<link>http://www.seous.com/blog/untargeted-traffic-is-waste-of-bandwith/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seous.com/blog/untargeted-traffic-is-waste-of-bandwith/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 23:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bandwidth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[untargeted]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seous.com/blog/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Traffic to your website means nothing if it is not targeted to your specific product, program, opportunity, or business. In order for traffic to be most effective, it must be targeted to your specific market, program, product, etc. If they&#8217;re not targeted, they&#8217;re wasting bandwidth. References: http://blog.seoptimise.com/category/google http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traffic to your website means nothing if it is not targeted to your specific product, program, opportunity, or business. In order for traffic to be most effective, it must be targeted to your specific market, program, product, etc.<br />
If they&#8217;re not targeted, they&#8217;re wasting bandwidth.</p>
<p>References:</p>
<p>http://blog.seoptimise.com/category/google</p>
<p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seous.com/blog/untargeted-traffic-is-waste-of-bandwith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hits are Irrelevant</title>
		<link>http://www.seous.com/blog/hits-are-irrelevant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seous.com/blog/hits-are-irrelevant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 21:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seous.com/hits-are-irrelevant/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A common myth these days revolves around the usage of the term &#8220;Hits&#8221; This term &#8220;Hits&#8221; is often used synonymously with &#8220;Visitors&#8221; It is extremely important to understand that a hit is not a visitor. A hit is basically triggered as any action from the server. In other words, it might be 1 hit for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A common myth these days revolves around the usage of the term &#8220;Hits&#8221; This term &#8220;Hits&#8221; is often used synonymously with &#8220;Visitors&#8221; It is extremely important to understand that a hit is not a visitor. A hit is basically triggered as any action from the server. In other words, it might be 1 hit for a page to load. Another hit for a logo to load. Perhaps a menu cluster of 10 buttons (10 graphics) could render 10 more hits. In short, just one visitor could generate multiple hits for each page they view. When you are examining traffic overall, your #1 concern should be with your &#8220;visitor count,&#8221; sometimes identified as &#8220;user sessions.&#8221; Focus should not be on the &#8220;hit count.&#8221; Our attention should always be on actual visitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seous.com/blog/hits-are-irrelevant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Go ask your search engine</title>
		<link>http://www.seous.com/blog/go-ask-your-search-engine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seous.com/blog/go-ask-your-search-engine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seous.com/go-ask-your-search-engine/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.seous.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/ask-se.gif" title="Go ask your search engine"><img src="http://www.seous.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/ask-se.gif" alt="Go ask your search engine" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seous.com/blog/go-ask-your-search-engine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canonical Issues &#8211; Redirecting non-www to www</title>
		<link>http://www.seous.com/blog/canonical-issues-redirecting-non-www-to-www/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seous.com/blog/canonical-issues-redirecting-non-www-to-www/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 04:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seous.com/canonical-issues-redirecting-non-www-to-www/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SEO consultants prefer to redirect domain.com to www.domain.com for SEO purposes. The thought is that some incoming links point to their non-www domain and some point to the www domain. So if the domains are consolidated, incoming links are as well. SEO consultants who use this redirect usually see instances of search engine rankings with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEO consultants prefer to redirect domain.com to www.domain.com for SEO purposes. The thought is that some incoming links point to their non-www domain and some point to the www domain. So if the domains are consolidated, incoming links are as well. SEO consultants who use this redirect usually see instances of search engine rankings with and without the www in their listings and want to consolidate their efforts.</p>
<p>Add the following four lines to your .htaccess file, replacing &#8216;domain.com&#8217; with your site&#8217;s domain:</p>
<p>Options +FollowSymlinks<br />
RewriteEngine on<br />
rewritecond %{http_host} ^domain.com [nc]<br />
rewriterule ^(.*)$ http://www.domain.com/$1 [r=301,nc]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seous.com/blog/canonical-issues-redirecting-non-www-to-www/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
